
Influence of annual forages on weed dynamics in a cropping system
A. Schoofs and M. H. Entz
Abstract
Alternatives to herbicides are needed for weed control. Field studies
were conducted in 1994/1995 and 1995/1996 to investigate the nature
of forage crop-weed dynamics and to test the effect of single year forage
crops on the density and community composition of annual weeds in a
following field pea (Pisium sativum L.) test crop.
Five spring-seeded forage treatments were compared with wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) grain crops (with or without herbicides for grassy
and broadleaved weeds): winter triticale (Triticosecale) (simulation
grazed); spring triticale (silage); spring/winter triticale intercrop
(silage, then simulation grazed); alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)
(hay); sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench × Sorghum
sudanese [Piper]) (hay); and a weedy fallow (silage). A fall rye (Secale
cereale L.) grain crop and a sweet clover (Melilotis officinalis
L.)/winter triticale double crop (hay, then simulation grazing)
were included in the 1995/1996 trial.
All forage systems were at least as effective as the sprayed wheat
control in suppressing wild oat (Avena fatua L.); however,
effects on other weeds, especially broadleaved species, were variable.
Biennial crops provided the best early season weed control, while long-season
systems such winter triticale and the triticale intercrop provided the
best late season weed control.
Forages shifted the weed community composition away from wild oat
and green foxtail (Setaria viridis L. Beauv.) to a similar
or greater extent than herbicide-treated wheat. Forage systems that
did not provide season-long crop competition tended to have more broadleaved
weeds.
Some forage systems increased pea grain yield the following year (relative
to the sprayed wheat control); however, forages alone did not eliminate
the need for herbicides in the pea crop. Annual forages may play an
important role in integrated weed management, especially for wild oat,
however further research to refine forage-based weed management systems
is needed.
Source
Canadian Journal of Plant Science (2000) 80: 187–198
Author Locations and Affilations
Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
en français
Posted September 2007
|