
It’s Not Too Early to Think of Seed Cleaning
By Tracy Salisbury and Brenda Frick
Wondering what crops to grow this spring? Considering soil fertility,
balancing the rotation, responding to markets? Ease of seed cleaning
is another consideration to be added to that list.
Farmers commonly have plant mixtures at harvest, whether they intercrop
intentionally, have volunteer plants from a previous year, or have weeds
that escaped control. Usually it is fairly easy to predict what crops
and weeds will dominate this year, simply by looking at what happened
last year. Some seed mixtures are hard to separate. It may be prudent
to select a crop this year that separates easily from the likely volunteers
and weeds.
When seeds are cleaned, “contaminants” are removed in a
variety of ways. The first step is at the sieves in the combine. Further
sieving may be done after combining. Sieves separate seeds mostly by
size, though shape can be important as well. Sieves are especially effective
at removing small weed seeds from larger crop seeds, such as pigweeds
from lentils. Some crop mixtures are relatively easy to separate by
size: mustard from barley or peas, barley or oat from lentil or pea.
A second stage in cleaning is often done on a gravity table, which
sorts seeds by weight or density. This is the most common type of on-farm
seed cleaning. It can be used, for instance, to separate thistle heads
out of peas and frosted kernels out of cereals.
A final cleaning might be done with a colour sorter. This equipment
is less common, so this step generally involves extra hauling, as well
as additional time and expense. Usually other methods are used before
colour sorting. A colour sorter may pick out pea chips from oats, for
instance.
Different markets have different levels of concern about other seeds
“contaminating” crops. For instance, the milling oat market
has a very low tolerance for foreign material, as their customers don’t
want to see lentil or pea chips in their oatmeal. Concern over wheat
allergies has led to a very low tolerance for wheat as a contaminant
of oats or flax in many markets.
The feed market generally has the most relaxed requirements for crop
purity. Often chips, splits and other crop types are combined in feed
mixtures, and legume pieces actually add useful protein to cereal grains.
A pea/barley mixture, for instance, can be an effective intercrop for
the feed market, but the two crops may not be separated well enough
to sell the barley into the malting or pearling market. This has a bearing
on rotation planning. Seeding barley on pea stubble might result in
pea contamination that would be difficult to remove from barley. Seeding
pea on barley stubble would be less problematic.
Seed cleaners claim that any crop can be cleaned out of any mixture,
but it becomes a question of economic feasibility. Separation is usually
based on the majority crop. For instance, with a flax crop with some
volunteer wheat, the wheat would be removed from the flax, with settings
that resulted in a nearly pure flax sample, as well as a wheat sample
that was much less pure. Growing flax on wheat stubble can result in
difficult contamination issues, whereas growing wheat on flax stubble
gives less contamination problems.
Several crop combinations present difficulties for seed cleaning. Lentil
splits, especially from small lentils, are hard to remove from flax.
Barley is hard to separate from either wheat or oats. Small seeded lentils
are hard to remove from oats or wheat.
Weed removal can also be a consideration. Weeds can be difficult to
remove from flax, as it is relatively small seeded. It is difficult
to clean out wild mustard or cow cockle from tame mustard. Wild oats
are tougher to separate from an oat crop than from other cereals. These
seed cleaning problems can be important considerations in crop selection.
Seed cleaning options are critical in planning a successful intercrop.
They can also be important in rotation planning, as this year’s
crop is likely to be mingled with volunteers from last year’s
crop. Knowing which seeds can be separated easily, and which separations
require more time, effort and expense can make planning more effective.
Tracy Salisbury, B.S.A., is an assistant in Organic Research and
Extension at the University of Saskatchewan. Brenda Frick, Ph.D., P.Ag.
is the Coordinator of Organic Research and Extension at the University
of Saskatchewan and an OACC Affiliate. She welcomes your comments at
306-966-4975 or via email at organic@usask.ca.
This article was commissioned by the Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada.
en français
Posted May 2009